Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Kuklinski
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Result was redirect; no referenced information worth merging --John (talk) 06:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Joseph Kuklinski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the required coverage for notability of a criminal. Almost all of the coverage seems to simply be passing mentions in coverage of his far more notable sibling. Yaksar (let's chat) 15:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Primary claim to notability is through his brother. --Cox wasan (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Fails WP:CRIME. Neither the person or the crime satisfy the notability requirements. -Gagg me with ah spoon (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CRIME. - DonCalo (talk) 18:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:PERP. LibStar (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relisting comment: This AfD was never transcluded and so I have "re"-listed to offer a wider view. — Scientizzle 19:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 19:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Scientizzle 19:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Scientizzle 19:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- REDIRECT to Richard Kuklinski. It's not an implausible search string, given their connection, and Joseph is mentioned in Richard's article. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the IP address →Σ ⚑ ☭ 07:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge fails WP:GNG, but interesting information suitable for his brother's page. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - He barely ever spoke to his brother, they were not connected to each other. --Cox wasan (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per the IP address - the bare bones of his life are in the article, and I don't think the rest is worthy of a merge. Colonel Tom 03:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.